‘Never investigate what you don’t want to confirm’
Posts made at another site develop my point that all important organizations are captured.
A writer at an email group where I participate just added two important links that show how official Covid inquiries are biased and how alleged truth seekers attack contrarians, who are the real truth seekers.
Here’s the original post that supports this writer’s point:
Comparison of treatment between two witnesses by Baroness Halite
Open letter to the chair:
Hallett Inquiry Videos:
Open letter to Baroness Hallett:
***
This short post (and the accompanying “Trust the Evidence” Substack articles) resonated with me and once again got me thinking about how evidence of “early spread” cannot be investigated by official sources.
I made three posts to develop my point, which I decided to include at my own Substack site:
Post 1 - My Main Point …
Thanks for highlighting the reprehensible treatment of a witness by people whose only agenda is to conceal the truth.
It's this simple: Our authority figures/rulers/experts never investigate that which they don't want to confirm. They also attack and try to discredit the experts who have tried to investigate topics they're not "supposed" to investigate.
A reader comment tells us why no real investigations into "the truth" can ever occur:
"When the Covid-19 enquiry was set up I had little faith because the truth would be a disaster for many politicians and the 'expert' advisors."
Exactly.
- Bill Rice, Jr.
Post 2 - I apparently had more points I wanted to make …
I'll give one example from my ‘early spread’ investigations that illustrates this truth-avoiding mind frame.
Belleville, NJ Mayor Michael Melham thinks he contracted Covid around Nov. 19, 2019. He experienced signature Covid symptoms, which his doctor can confirm, and he later tested positive for Covid antibodies with two different antibody tests, which his doctor could also confirm.
Thirdly, as far as I'm aware, Mayor Melham never contracted PCR-confirmed Covid after his illness of November 2019, which suggests he might have acquired natural immunity from this illness.
I happen to think Mayor Melham did have Covid in November 2019. However, I will allow it's possible he did not.
The most-important point in the “possible Melham case" is that no public health official in America or New Jersey bothered to look into the possibility he might have had Covid.
No public health officials (who should have been extremely interested in dating early Covid cases) ever questioned Melham, inspected his medical records, re-tested him for antibodies with AB tests of their own choosing, or talked to any of the other "many" people that Melham said got sick with the same symptoms at the Atlantic City conference where he first became sick.
The press, which wrote about his claims, dismissed this mayor as a kook and reprimanded him for even sharing this belief. He should have just remained silent, they wrote.
Going back to the quote I highlighted above, I think I know why officials never investigated his claim ..... "because the truth would be a disaster for many politicians and the 'expert' advisors."
This is a great comment, but I would add: “and mainstream journalists, who also went all-in on the bogus or dubious narratives.”
Again, these officials and experts don't investigate that which they don't want to confirm. This has been their m.o. with every inconvenient set of Covid facts.
This should be THE "smoking gun" that shows the true nature of our alleged experts and alleged "truth-seeking" officials. They are not practicing real science or real journalism.
.... Also, every important organization is captured.
- Bill Rice, Jr.
Post 3 - Once I get going, it’s hard for me to stop …
I would think two groups of public health officials must exist.
The first group might read a claim of someone like Mayor Melham and say, “That’s dangerous misinformation and can’t be true” … and then they would go about looking into his claim and showing why and how Melham’s belief is wrong.
If they’re so certain “early spread” couldn’t have happened, it would be easy to debunk claims it did happen … and these officials would be eager to show these type claims could not be true. They'd then provide the public all the sound reasons these claims couldn’t have been true.
As far as I can tell (via observation or “known knowables”), the number of officials in this group is … zero. No official in the world took on the project to debunk or disprove Melham’s claims.
Members of the next group ….
The second group might be those who are neutral or open to all possibilities and would be eager to investigate any possible narrative-changing claims.
Given enough intriguing details, these people would rush to investigate eye-opening claims like those made by Mayor Melham.
Again, from observable evidence, none of the tens of thousands of public health officials in the world seem to have fallen into this group.
To me, these observations seem to confirm that 100 percent of public health agencies/officials must be captured, confirming that no curious-minded real scientists or truth-seekers exist in these agencies.
A few officials like this must exist …
FWIW, I do think a few public health officials probably proposed doing follow-up investigations with people like Melham. They might have said to someone in their agencies: “Shouldn’t we at least investigate this?”
If any person thought or said this, they were obviously over-ruled … and remained silent and have never become a whistleblower who was willing to point out all the common-sense investigations that were nixed and thus never happened.
This would again seem to show how captured these “truth-seeking” agencies really are. (Also how ruthless and effective they are at silencing dissent in their own agencies).
And it’s not just “early spread” candidates who are off-limits to real investigations. Vaccine deaths and injuries are also off-limits to real investigations. Every important area of inquiry is effectively off limits to real investigations.
I maintain this could only happen if every important scientific or public health organization was completely captured.
It’s also impossible for the public to learn facts like these (which are kind-of important) … because the “watchdog” mainstream press that’s supposed to tell us this … is also completely captured.
- Bill Rice, Jr.
I'd like to emphasize how important it was for officials to NOT investigate Mayor Melham's possible very early case. If they had investigated his claim and did confirm he had Covid, they would have just confirmed that every part of their narrative (and the response that followed) was a lie.
If Mayor Melham had Covid by November 19, 2019, he wasn't the only person in America or the world who had Covid. The virus was spreading when he got it - indeed that's how he got it. He also said many or "numerous" people who attended the conference he attended also got sick at the same time. These people contacted the mayor (presumably by email) ... so there were records of several or many other people who might have been "early" Covid patients. Officials could and should have also contacted these people and tested them for antibodies.
My strongly-held belief: That's the last thing these so-called virus-origin sleuths wanted to do. In other words, the last thing these "truth-seeking" agencies want to do is ... investigate the truth and go where the evidence suggests they go.
Right there that's all we need to know about these people and organizations. They are all frauds ... and everyone should have known this fact much earlier. Most Americans still don't know this.
Oddly enough, the 2020 election irregularities inn Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Maricopa County have received the cold shoulder from “official” government agencies and national media....exactly like early Covid non-inquiries.